Abstract

Self-supporting transmission gratings suitable for the soft x-ray and extreme ultraviolet must be reinforced by support structures which, if regularly placed, tend to produce undesirable artifacts in the diffraction plane. Because these artifacts appear in the neighborhood of the principal maxima and can be substantial in magnitude, they may confuse the spectrum. Methods are described whereby these unwanted diffraction effects are much reduced or eliminated. In one method, the members of the support structure parallel to the grating slits are placed in a random pattern so that on the average the coherence of the support structure is drastically reduced everywhere. In a second method, these support structure members are distributed pseudorandomly in such a manner that the diffraction pattern of the support structure is completely removed from the diffraction plane. A third method is investigated in which the pseudorandom placement of supports is organized into a repeated pattern, which may be easier to manufacture than the configurations of the first two methods.

© 1989 Optical Society of America

Efficiency measurements of reflection gratings in the 100–300-Å band

John F. Meekins, Michael P. Kowalski, and Raymond G. Cruddace
Appl. Opt. 28(7) 1369-1377 (1989)

Interference patterns in cross-grating interferometers: further analysis

Yih-Shyang Cheng
Appl. Opt. 28(3) 556-564 (1989)

Optimization of the Rowland circle grating for high-resolution astrophysical spectrometers working at soft x-ray and EUV wavelengths

John F. Meekins, Herbert Gursky, and Raymond G. Cruddace
Appl. Opt. 24(18) 2987-2995 (1985)

Diffraction efficiency of 200-nm-period critical-angle transmission gratings in the soft x-ray and extreme ultraviolet wavelength bands

Ralf K. Heilmann, Minseung Ahn, Alex Bruccoleri, Chih-Hao Chang, Eric M. Gullikson, Pran Mukherjee, and Mark L. Schattenburg
Appl. Opt. 50(10) 1364-1373 (2011)

Spatial modifications of Gaussian beams diffracted by reflection gratings

Shuzhang Zhang and Theodor Tamir
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6(9) 1368-1381 (1989)